I think people are confusing Quicksort the partition-based sorting algorithm, and "qsort" the various library implementations.
I prefer to see Quicksort the algorithm as having a pluggable pivot selection algorithm, which is quite essential in analyzing its behavior.
If the first element is always chosen as the pivot, then an already sorted list is the worst-case. Often there's a high probability that the array is already/nearly sorted, so this implementation is rather poor.
Analogously, selecting the last element as the pivot is bad for the same reason.
Some implementations tries to avoid this problem by choosing the middle element as the pivot. This would not perform as badly on already/nearly sorted arrays, but one could still construct an input that would exploit this predictable pivot selection and make it run in quadratic time.
Thus, you get randomized pivot selection algorithms, but even this doesn't guarantee O(N log N).
So other algorithms were developed that would use some information from the sequence before picking a pivot. You can of course scan the whole sequence and find the median, and use that as the pivot. This guarantees O(N log N), but of course slower in practice.
So some corners are cut, and people devised the median-of-3 algorithm. Of course, later even this was exploitable by the so-called median-of-3 "killer".
So more attempts are made at coming up with more "intelligent" pivot selection algorithms that guarantees O(N log N) asymptotic behavior that is still fast enough to be practical, with varying degree of success.
So really, unless one specifies a particular implementation of Quicksort, the question of when the worst case scenario occurs is ill-defined. If you use the so-called median-of-medians pivot selection algorithm, there is no quadratic worst-case scenario.
Most library implementations, however, are likely to forfeit O(N log N) guarantee for much faster sorting in the average case. Some of the really old implementations use the first element as the pivot, which is now well-understood as poor and is no longer a practice widely followed.
