Welcome to WuJiGu Developer Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
835 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

performance - Any Faster RMS Value Calculation in C?

I am writing a software for a small 8-bit microcontroller in C. Part of the code is to read the ADC value of a current transformer (ZCT), and then calculate the RMS value. The current flowing through the ZCT is sinusoidal but it can be distorted. My code as follow:

float       adc_value, inst_current;
float       acc_load_current;           // accumulator = (I1*I1 + I2*I2 + ... + In*In)
double      rms_current;

// Calculate the real instantanous value from the ADC reading
inst_current = (adc_value/1024)*2.5;    // 10bit ADC, Voltage ref. 2.5V, so formula is: x=(adc/1024)*2.5V                           

// Update the RMS value with the new instananous value:
// Substract 1 sample from the accumulator (sample size is 512, so divide accumulator by 512 and substract it from the accumulator)
acc_load_current -= (acc_load_current / 512);       
inst_current *= inst_current;          // square the instantanous current
acc_load_current += inst_current;      // Add it to the accumulator

rms_current = (acc_load_current / 512);  // Get the mean square value. (sample size is 512)
rms_current = sqrt(rms_current);         // Get RMS value

// Now the < rms_current > is the real RMS current

However, it has many floating point calculations. This adds a large burden to my small MCU. And I found that the sqrt() function does not work in my compiler.

Is there any code that could run faster?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

When you need to get faster on an processor that lacks an FPU, your best bet is to replace floating point calculations with fixed point. Combine this with joop's suggestion (a one Newton-Raphson sqrt) and you get something like this:

#define INITIAL 512  /* Initial value of the filter memory. */
#define SAMPLES 512

uint16_t rms_filter(uint16_t sample)
{
    static uint16_t rms = INITIAL;
    static uint32_t sum_squares = 1UL * SAMPLES * INITIAL * INITIAL;

    sum_squares -= sum_squares / SAMPLES;
    sum_squares += (uint32_t) sample * sample;
    if (rms == 0) rms = 1;    /* do not divide by zero */
    rms = (rms + sum_squares / SAMPLES / rms) / 2;
    return rms;
}

Just run your raw ADC samples through this filter. You may add a few bit-shifts here and there to get more resolution, but you have to be careful not to overflow your variables. And I doubt you really need the extra resolution.

The output of the filter is in the same unit as its input. In this case, it is the unit of your ADC: 2.5 V / 1024 ≈ 2.44 mV. If you can keep this unit in subsequent calculations, you will save cycles by avoiding unnecessary conversions. If you really need the value to be in volts (it may be an I/O requirement), then you will have to convert to floating point. If you want millivolts, you can stay in the integer realm:

uint16_t rms_in_mV = rms_filter(raw_sample) * 160000UL >> 16;

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to WuJiGu Developer Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...